Upcoming Events and other ways you can get involved

Kane County Forest Preserve District Study: 2013 Report – Brunner Forest Preserve – Still Not Open

In October 2008, the KCFPD purchased the Brunner Farm for a record-breaking $40 million, using referendum money and grants.  At the time, Director of Natural Resources Drew Ulberg declared it "the single most important land purchase the district has ever made."  More than four and a half years later, in May of 2013, the Brunner Forest Preserve is still not open.  While some preliminary work has been completed, there is still a chain across the entrance.  The OSLAD Project Agreement signed by President John Hoscheit on May 26, 2009 stipulated that the site should be open to the public within [...]

By |2013-10-16T08:49:09-05:00October 16th, 2013|

Kane County Forest Preserve District Study: 2013 Report – Current Concerns

In the course of studying the original gravel mining controversy surrounding Brunner Forest Preserve, a number of other issues came up which led to the decision to broaden the scope of the ongoing study to include "mission drift", the inherent conflict of interest posed by the Kane County Board members/Forest Preserve Commissioners "wearing two hats", financial questions, and transparency issues.  To reflect the expansion of the original study scope, the continuing study has been renamed the Kane County Forest Preserve District Study.  This is an update on those issues, and on Brunner Forest Preserve. Continue Reading...

By |2013-10-16T08:44:49-05:00October 16th, 2013|

Kane County Forest Preserve District Study: 2013 Report – Introduction

In March 2012, The League of Women Voters of the Elgin Area released a two-year study of Potential Gravel Mining in the Brunner Forest Preserve of Kane County. The study was undertaken after strong local reaction to quiet discussions by the Kane County Forest Preserve District of the possibility of mining for gravel in the newly purchased $40 million preserve. The way in which the idea of gravel mining in Brunner Forest Preserve came to public attention in early 2010 was a strong indicator of how the story would unfold. It was not put out for public discussion as an economic or land use question. It leaked out. It came out in bits and pieces, with information and misinformation, accusations and denials, and above all, anger. Like a juicy bit of gossip, it spread through the grapevine. The very people who had worked with the Forest Preserve District to pass referendums to acquire and preserve natural areas, who had volunteered for work days to restore and improve the preserves, and who had been its most vocal supporters, now felt angry and betrayed. The Elgin Area LWV Brunner Study examined the facts and the record to complete the first phase of the study, which concluded that gravel mining is inappropriate in Brunner Forest Preserve or any other forest preserve. Indeed, the extraction and sale of natural resources, whether gravel, coal, timber, natural gas or water, is inconsistent with the mission of the forest preserve. It also concluded that certain land use decisions by the Kane County Forest Preserve District raise questions of "mission drift" from the stated goal of preserving and restoring the nature of Kane County.

By |2019-06-06T17:34:58-05:00October 16th, 2013|

Illinois, the Land of Big (and small) Government

How Many Units of Government Are There? (And Why?); What's In Your Tax Bill? The LWV of the Elgin area will study the number of separate taxing bodies in Kane County, including their functions, budgets, number of employees, overlap of responsibilities, and long term costs.

By |2015-06-09T10:02:19-05:00May 12th, 2013|
Go to Top