Forest Preserve Committee

The Kane County Forest Preserve District Study began with the Study of Potential Gravel Mining in Brunner Forest Preserve in 2010-2012. The follow-up Kane County Forest Preserve District Study expanded the scope to include compliance with the Downstate Forest Preserve Act, public transparency, and the "mission drift" from the District's own mission statement and goals. In 2014-2015, the study focused on monitoring of current policies and practices, a comparison to other Districts, and educating elected officials and voters on the issues. For 2015-2016, the study group will become a standing committee to monitor and report on the Forest Preserve District.

By |2015-06-09T10:27:33-05:00June 9th, 2015|

Kane County Forest Preserve District Study: 2013 Report – LWVEA Position Statement Adopted by Consensus on September 18, 2013

Open Brunner Forest Preserve to the public and put a higher priority on restoration of this largest and most expensive purchase ever made by the Forest Preserve District. Support SB 1344, introduced by Senator Michael Noland, or comparable legislation, to amend the Downstate Forest Preserve Act to ban any new sand, gravel, or other mining operations on land owned or acquired by a forest preserve district. Support further amending the Downstate Forest Preserve Act to ban the extraction and sale of natural resources, including gravel, coal, timber, oil, natural gas and water, from land owned or acquired by a forest [...]

By |2013-10-16T09:54:49-05:00October 16th, 2013|

Kane County Forest Preserve District Study: 2013 Report – Summary

Overall, this study finds that there is still room for improvement in transparency with regard to public access to information and, most importantly, acknowledgement of the public's right to know.  Even when the Forest Preserve Commissioners honestly feel that they know best, and are making the best choices for the people they represent, they must make every effort to comply with the spirit as well as the letter of the law.  They also need to be cognizant of the potential conflict of interest posed by serving on two boards with different missions, and take steps to deal with that conflict [...]

By |2013-10-16T09:55:35-05:00October 16th, 2013|
Go to Top